Methods for driving electro-optic displays

ABSTRACT

A driving method is provided for an electric-optic display having a plurality of display pixels, the method including dividing the plurality of display pixels into multiple groups of pixels, applying at least one waveform structure to the multiple groups of pixels, the at least one waveform structure having a driving section for updating the multiple groups of pixels, and updating the multiple groups of pixels in a contiguous fashion such that only one group of display pixels completes the driving section at any given time.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to U.S. Provisional Application 62/481,339filed on Apr. 4, 2017. The entire disclosure of the aforementionedapplication is herein incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

This invention relates to methods for driving electro-optic displays,especially bistable electro-optic displays. More specifically, thisinvention relates to driving methods which are intended to reduceundesirable visual effects during transitions from one image to another.This invention is especially, but not exclusively, intended for use withparticle-based electrophoretic displays in which one or more types ofelectrically charged particles are suspended in a liquid and are movedthrough the liquid under the influence of an electric field to changethe appearance of the display.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

As discussed above, various techniques are known using global limitedand other drive schemes to reduce the flashiness of transitions inelectro-optic displays. However, in some cases, or in certain productsand/or applications, it may be desirable to completely refresh thedisplay at each transitional images to create smooth appeal.

Provided here is a driving method for an electric-optic display having aplurality of display pixels, the method including dividing the pluralityof display pixels into multiple groups of pixels, applying at least onewaveform structure to the multiple groups of pixels, the at least onewaveform structure having a driving section for updating the multiplegroups of pixels, and updating the multiple groups of pixels in acontiguous fashion such that only one group of display pixels completesthe driving section at any given time.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Various aspects and embodiments of the application will be describedwith reference to the following figures. It should be appreciated thatthe figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. Items appearing inmultiple figures are indicated by the same reference number in all thefigures in which they appear.

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a display screen beingupdated with a scrolling bar;

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a display screen beingupdated with an expanding ring;

FIGS. 3A-3C are exemplary waveforms that may be adopted to update adisplay in accordance with the subject matter presented herein;

FIG. 3D is a drawing illustrates multiple groups of display pixels andedge effects that may arise from updating these groups in accordancewith the subject matter presented herein;

FIG. 4 illustrates an example of waveform encoding showing 16transitions for a smooth update in accordance with the subject matterpresented herein; and

FIG. 5 is an example detailing the steps required to create a white toblack transition with a scrolling bar effect from top to bottom usingthe subject matter presented herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The electro-optic displays in which the methods of the present inventionare used often contain an electro-optic material which is a solid in thesense that the electro-optic material has solid external surfaces,although the material may, and often does, have internal liquid- orgas-filled space. Such displays using solid electro-optic materials mayhereinafter for convenience be referred to as “solid electro-opticdisplays”.

The term “electro-optic” as applied to a material or a display, is usedherein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to amaterial having first and second display states differing in at leastone optical property, the material being changed from its first to itssecond display state by application of an electric field to thematerial. Although the optical property is typically color perceptibleto the human eye, it may be another optical property, such as opticaltransmission, reflectance, luminescence or, in the case of displaysintended for machine reading, pseudo-color in the sense of a change inreflectance of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the visible range.

The term “gray state” is used herein in its conventional meaning in theimaging art to refer to a state intermediate two extreme optical statesof a pixel, and does not necessarily imply a black-white transitionbetween these two extreme states. For example, several of the patentsand published applications referred to below describe electrophoreticdisplays in which the extreme states are white and deep blue, so that anintermediate “gray state” would actually be pale blue. Indeed; asalready mentioned the transition between the two extreme states may notbe a color change at all. The term “gray level” is used herein to denotethe possible optical states of a pixel, including the two extremeoptical states.

The terms “bistable” and “bistability” are used herein in theirconventional meaning in the art to refer to displays comprising displayelements having first and second display states differing in at leastone optical property, and such that after any given element has beendriven, by means of an addressing pulse of finite duration, to assumeeither its first or second display state, after the addressing pulse hasterminated, that state will persist for at least several times, forexample at least four times, the minimum duration of the addressingpulse required to change the state of the display element. It is shownin published U.S. Patent Application No. 2002/0180687 that someparticle-based electrophoretic displays capable of gray scale are stablenot only in their extreme black and white states but also in theirintermediate gray states, and the same is true of some other types ofelectro-optic displays. This type of display is properly called“multi-stable” rather than bistable, although for convenience the term“bistable” may be used herein to cover both bistable and multi-stabledisplays.

The term “impulse” is used herein in its conventional meaning of theintegral of voltage with respect to time. However, some bistableelectro-optic media act as charge transducers, and with such media analternative definition of impulse, namely the integral of current overtime (which is equal to the total charge applied) may be used. Theappropriate definition of impulse should be used, depending on whetherthe medium acts as a voltage-time impulse transducer or a charge impulsetransducer.

Much of the discussion below will focus on methods for driving one ormore pixels of an electro-optic display through a transition from aninitial gray level to a final gray level (which may or may not bedifferent from the initial gray level). The term “waveform” will be usedto denote the entire voltage against time curve used to effect thetransition from one specific initial gray level to a specific final graylevel. Typically such a waveform will comprise a plurality of waveformelements; where these elements are essentially rectangular (i.e., wherea given element comprises application of a constant voltage for a periodof time); the elements may be called “pulses” or “drive pulses”. Theterm “drive scheme” denotes a set of waveforms sufficient to effect allpossible transitions between gray levels for a specific display. Adisplay may make use of more than one drive scheme; for example, theaforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,600 teaches that a drive scheme mayneed to be modified depending upon parameters such as the temperature ofthe display or the time for which it has been in operation during itslifetime, and thus a display may be provided with a plurality ofdifferent drive schemes to be used at differing temperature etc. A setof drive schemes used in this manner may be referred to as “a set ofrelated drive schemes.” It is also possible, as described in several ofthe below mentioned Methods for driving displays applications, to usemore than one drive scheme simultaneously in different areas of the samedisplay, and a set of drive schemes used in this manner may be referredto as “a set of simultaneous drive schemes.”

Several types of electro-optic displays are known. One type ofelectro-optic display is a rotating bichromal member type as described,for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,808,783; 5,777,782; 5,760,761;6,054,071 6,055,091; 6,097,531; 6,128,124; 6,137,467; and 6,147,791(although this type of display is often referred to as a “rotatingbichromal ball” display, the term “rotating bichromal member” ispreferred as more accurate since in some of the patents mentioned abovethe rotating members are not spherical). Such a display uses a largenumber of small bodies (typically spherical or cylindrical) which havetwo or more sections with differing optical characteristics, and aninternal dipole. These bodies are suspended within liquid-filledvacuoles within a matrix, the vacuoles being filled with liquid so thatthe bodies are free to rotate. The appearance of the display is changedby applying an electric field thereto, thus rotating the bodies tovarious positions and varying which of the sections of the bodies isseen through a, viewing surface. This type of electro-optic medium istypically bistable.

Another type of electro-optic display uses an electrochromic medium, forexample an electrochromic medium in the form of a nanochromic filmcomprising an electrode formed at least in part from a semi-conductingmetal oxide and a plurality of dye molecules capable of reversible colorchange attached to the electrode; see, for example O'Regan, B., et al.,Nature 1991, 353, 737; and Wood, D., Information Display, 18(3), 24(March 2002). See also Bach, U., et al., Adv. Mater., 2002, 14(11), 845.Nanochromic films of this type are also described, for example, in U.S.Pat. Nos. 6,301,038; 6,870,657; and 6,950,220. This type of medium isalso typically bistable.

Another type of electro-optic display is an electro-wetting displaydeveloped by Philips and described in Hayes, R. A., et al., “Video-SpeedElectronic Paper Based on Electrowetting”, Nature, 425, 383-385 (2003).It is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,420,549 that such electro-wettingdisplays can be made bistable.

One type of electro-optic display, which has been the subject of intenseresearch and development for a number of years, is the particle-basedelectrophoretic display, in which a plurality of charged particles movethrough a fluid under the influence of an electric field.Electrophoretic displays can have attributes of good brightness andcontrast, wide viewing angles, state bistability, and low powerconsumption when compared with liquid crystal displays. Nevertheless,problems with the long-term image quality of these displays haveprevented their widespread usage. For example, particles that make upelectrophoretic displays tend to settle, resulting in inadequateservice-life for these displays.

As noted above, electrophoretic media require the presence of a fluid.In most prior art electrophoretic media, this fluid is a liquid, butelectrophoretic media can be produced using gaseous fluids; see, forexample, Kitamura, T., et al., “Electrical toner movement for electronicpaper-like display”, IDW Japan, 2001, Paper HCS1-1, and Yamaguchi, Y.,et al., “Toner display using insulative particles chargedtriboelectrically”, IDW Japan, 2001, Paper AMD4-4). See also U.S. Pat.Nos. 7,321,459 and 7,236,291. Such gas-based electrophoretic mediaappear to be susceptible to the same types of problems due to particlesettling as liquid-based electrophoretic media, when the media are usedin an orientation which permits such settling, for example in a signwhere the medium is disposed in a vertical plane. Indeed, particlesettling appears to be a more serious problem in gas-basedelectrophoretic media than in liquid-based ones, since the lowerviscosity of gaseous suspending fluids as compared with liquid onesallows more rapid settling of the electrophoretic particles.

Numerous patents and applications assigned to or in the names of theMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), E Ink Corporation, E InkCalifornia, LLC. and related companies describe various technologiesused in encapsulated and microcell electrophoretic and otherelectro-optic media. Encapsulated electrophoretic media comprisenumerous small capsules, each of which itself comprises an internalphase containing electrophoretically-mobile particles in a fluid medium,and a capsule wall surrounding the internal phase. Typically, thecapsules are themselves held within a polymeric binder to form acoherent layer positioned between two electrodes. In a microcellelectrophoretic display, the charged particles and the fluid are notencapsulated within microcapsules but instead are retained within aplurality of cavities formed within a carrier medium, typically apolymeric film. The technologies described in these patents andapplications include:

-   -   (a) Electrophoretic particles, fluids and fluid additives; see        for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,002,728 and 7,679,814;    -   (b) Capsules, binders and encapsulation processes; see for        example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,922,276 and 7,411,719;    -   (c) Microcell structures, wall materials, and methods of forming        microcells; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,072,095 and        9,279,906;    -   (d) Methods for filling and sealing microcells; see for example        U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,144,942 and 7,715,088;    -   (e) Films and sub-assemblies containing electro-optic materials;        see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,982,178 and 7,839,564;    -   (f) Backplanes, adhesive layers and other auxiliary layers and        methods used in displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos.        7,116,318 and 7,535,624;    -   (g) Color formation and color adjustment; see for example U.S.        Pat. Nos. 7,075,502 and 7,839,564;    -   (h) Methods for driving displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos.        5,930,026; 6,445,489; 6,504,524; 6,512,354; 6,531,997;        6,753,999; 6,825,970; 6,900,851; 6,995,550; 7,012,600;        7,023,420; 7,034,783; 7,061,166; 7,061,662; 7,116,466;        7,119,772; 7,177,066; 7,193,625; 7,202,847; 7,242,514;        7,259,744; 7,304,787; 7,312,794; 7,327,511; 7,408,699;        7,453,445; 7,492,339; 7,528,822; 7,545,358; 7,583,251;        7,602,374; 7,612,760; 7,679,599; 7,679,813; 7,683,606;        7,688,297; 7,729,039; 7,733,311; 7,733,335; 7,787,169;        7,859,742; 7,952,557; 7,956,841; 7,982,479; 7,999,787;        8,077,141; 8,125,501; 8,139,050; 8,174,490; 8,243,013;        8,274,472; 8,289,250; 8,300,006; 8,305,341; 8,314,784;        8,373,649; 8,384,658; 8,456,414; 8,462,102; 8,514,168;        8,537,105; 8,558,783; 8,558,785; 8,558,786; 8,558,855;        8,576,164; 8,576,259; 8,593,396; 8,605,032; 8,643,595;        8,665,206; 8,681,191; 8,730,153; 8,810,525; 8,928,562;        8,928,641; 8,976,444; 9,013,394; 9,019,197; 9,019,198;        9,019,318; 9,082,352; 9,171,508; 9,218,773; 9,224,338;        9,224,342; 9,224,344; 9,230,492; 9,251,736; 9,262,973;        9,269,311; 9,299,294; 9,373,289; 9,390,066; 9,390,661; and        9,412,314; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos.        2003/0102858; 2004/0246562; 2005/0253777; 2007/0091418;        2007/0103427; 2007/0176912; 2008/0024429; 2008/0024482;        2008/0136774; 2008/0291129; 2008/0303780; 2009/0174651;        2009/0195568; 2009/0322721; 2010/0194733; 2010/0194789;        2010/0220121; 2010/0265561; 2010/0283804; 2011/0063314;        2011/0175875; 2011/0193840; 2011/0193841; 2011/0199671;        2011/0221740; 2012/0001957; 2012/0098740; 2013/0063333;        2013/0194250; 2013/0249782; 2013/0321278; 2014/0009817;        2014/0085355; 2014/0204012; 2014/0218277; 2014/0240210;        2014/0240373; 2014/0253425; 2014/0292830; 2014/0293398;        2014/0333685; 2014/0340734; 2015/0070744; 2015/0097877;        2015/0109283; 2015/0213749; 2015/0213765; 2015/0221257;        2015/0262255; 2015/0262551; 2016/0071465; 2016/0078820;        2016/0093253; 2016/0140910; and 2016/0180777;    -   (i) Applications of displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos.        7,312,784 and 8,009,348; and    -   (j) Non-electrophoretic displays, as described in U.S. Pat. No.        6,241,921 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No.        2015/0277160; and applications of encapsulation and microcell        technology other than displays; see for example U.S. Pat. No.        7,615,325; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos.        2015/0005720 and 2016/0012710.

Many of the aforementioned patents and applications recognize that thewalls surrounding the discrete microcapsules in an encapsulatedelectrophoretic medium could be replaced by a continuous phase, thusproducing a so-called polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display, inwhich the electrophoretic medium comprises a plurality of discretedroplets of an electrophoretic fluid and a continuous phase of apolymeric material, and that the discrete droplets of electrophoreticfluid within such a polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display may beregarded as capsules or microcapsules even though no discrete capsulemembrane is associated with each individual droplet; see for example,the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,866,760. Accordingly, for purposes ofthe present application, such polymer-dispersed electrophoretic mediaare regarded as sub-species of encapsulated electrophoretic media.

A related type of electrophoretic display is a so-called “microcellelectrophoretic display”. In a microcell electrophoretic display, thecharged particles and the fluid are not encapsulated withinmicrocapsules but instead are retained within a plurality of cavitiesformed within a carrier medium, typically a polymeric film. See, forexample, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,672,921 and 6,788,449, both assigned to SipixImaging, Inc.

Although electrophoretic media are often opaque (since, for example, inmany electrophoretic media, the particles substantially blocktransmission of visible light through the display) and operate in areflective mode, many electrophoretic displays can be made to operate ina so-called “shutter mode” in which one display state is substantiallyopaque and one is light-transmissive. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos.5,872,552; 6,130,774; 6,144,361; 6,172,798; 6,271,823; 6,225,971; and6,184,856. Dielectrophoretic displays, which are similar toelectrophoretic displays but rely upon variations in electric fieldstrength, can operate in a similar mode; see U.S. Pat. No. 4,418,346.Other types of electro-optic displays may also be capable of operatingin shutter mode. Electro-optic media operating in shutter mode may beuseful in multi-layer structures for full color displays; in suchstructures, at least one layer adjacent the viewing surface of thedisplay operates in shutter mode to expose or conceal a second layermore distant from the viewing surface.

An encapsulated electrophoretic display typically does not suffer fromthe clustering and settling failure mode of traditional electrophoreticdevices and provides further advantages, such as the ability to print orcoat the display on a wide variety of flexible and rigid substrates.(Use of the word “printing” is intended to include all forms of printingand coating, including, but without limitation: pre-metered coatingssuch as patch die coating, slot or extrusion coating, slide or cascadecoating, curtain coating; roll coating such as knife over roll coating,forward and reverse roll coating; gravure coating; dip coating; spraycoating; meniscus coating; spin coating, brush coating; air knifecoating, silk screen printing processes; electrostatic printingprocesses; thermal printing processes; ink jet printing processes;electrophoretic deposition (See U.S. Pat. No. 7,339,715); and othersimilar techniques.) Thus, the resulting display can be flexible.Further, because the display medium can be printed (using a variety ofmethods), the display itself can be made inexpensively.

Other types of electro-optic media may also be used in the displays ofthe present invention.

The bistable or multi-stable behavior of particle-based electrophoreticdisplays, and other electro-optic displays displaying similar behavior(such displays may hereinafter for convenience be referred to as“impulse driven displays”), is in marked contrast to that ofconventional liquid crystal (“LC”) displays. Twisted nematic liquidcrystals are not bi- or multi-stable but act as voltage transducers, sothat applying a given electric field to a pixel of such a displayproduces a specific gray level at the pixel, regardless of the graylevel previously present at the pixel. Furthermore, LC displays are onlydriven in one direction (from non-transmissive or “dark” to transmissiveor “light”), the reverse transition from a lighter state to a darker onebeing effected by reducing or eliminating the electric field. Finally,the gray level of a pixel of an LC display is not sensitive to thepolarity of the electric field, only to its magnitude, and indeed fortechnical reasons commercial LC displays usually reverse the polarity ofthe driving field at frequent intervals. In contrast, bistableelectro-optic displays act, to a first approximation, as impulsetransducers, so that the final state of a pixel depends not only uponthe electric field applied and the time for which this field is applied,but also upon the state of the pixel prior to the application of theelectric field.

Whether or not the electro-optic medium used is bistable, to obtain ahigh-resolution display, individual pixels of a display must beaddressable without interference from adjacent pixels. One way toachieve this objective is to provide an array of non-linear elements,such as transistors or diodes, with at least one non-linear elementassociated with each pixel, to produce an “active matrix” display. Anaddressing or pixel electrode, which addresses one pixel, is connectedto an appropriate voltage source through the associated non-linearelement. Typically, when the non-linear element is a transistor, thepixel electrode is connected to the drain of the transistor, and thisarrangement will be assumed in the following description, although it isessentially arbitrary and the pixel electrode could be connected to thesource of the transistor. Conventionally, in high resolution arrays, thepixels are arranged in a two-dimensional array of rows and columns, suchthat any specific pixel is uniquely defined by the intersection of onespecified row and one specified column. The sources of all thetransistors in each column are connected to a single column electrode,while the gates of all the transistors in each row are connected to asingle row electrode; again the assignment of sources to rows and gatesto columns is conventional but essentially arbitrary, and could bereversed if desired. The row electrodes are connected to a row driver,which essentially ensures that at any given moment only one row isselected, i.e., that there is applied to the selected row electrode avoltage such as to ensure that all the transistors in the selected roware conductive, while there is applied to all other rows a voltage suchas to ensure that all the transistors in these non-selected rows remainnon-conductive. The column electrodes are connected to column drivers,which place upon the various column electrodes voltages selected todrive the pixels in the selected row to their desired optical states.(The aforementioned voltages are relative to a common front electrodewhich is conventionally provided on the opposed side of theelectro-optic medium from the non-linear array and extends across thewhole display.) After a pre-selected interval known as the “line addresstime” the selected row is deselected, the next row is selected, and thevoltages on the column drivers are changed so that the next line of thedisplay is written. This process is repeated so that the entire displayis written in a row-by-row manner.

It might at first appear that the ideal method for addressing such animpulse-driven electro-optic display would be so-called “generalgrayscale image flow” in which a controller arranges each writing of animage so that each pixel transitions directly from its initial graylevel to its final gray level. However, inevitably there is some errorin writing images on an impulse-driven display. Some such errorsencountered in practice include:

-   -   (a) Prior State Dependence; With at least some electro-optic        media, the impulse required to switch a pixel to a new optical        state depends not only on the current and desired optical state,        but also on the previous optical states of the pixel.    -   (b) Dwell Time Dependence; With at least some electro-optic        media, the impulse required to switch a pixel to a new optical        state depends on the time that the pixel has spent in its        various optical states. The precise nature of this dependence is        not well understood, but in general, more impulse is required        the longer the pixel has been in its current optical state.    -   (c) Temperature Dependence; The impulse required to switch a        pixel to a new optical state depends heavily on temperature.    -   (d) Humidity Dependence; The impulse required to switch a pixel        to a new optical state depends, with at least some types of        electro-optic media, on the ambient humidity.    -   (e) Mechanical Uniformity; The impulse required to switch a        pixel to a new optical state may be affected by mechanical        variations in the display, for example variations in the        thickness of an electro-optic medium or an associated lamination        adhesive. Other types of mechanical non-uniformity may arise        from inevitable variations between different manufacturing        batches of medium, manufacturing tolerances and materials        variations.    -   (f) Voltage Errors; The actual impulse applied to a pixel will        inevitably differ slightly from that theoretically applied        because of unavoidable slight errors in the voltages delivered        by drivers.

General grayscale image flow suffers from an “accumulation of errors”phenomenon. For example, imagine that temperature dependence results ina 0.2 L* (where L* has the usual CIE definition:

L*=116(R/R ₀)^(1/3)−16,

where R is the reflectance and R₀ is a standard reflectance value) errorin the positive direction on each transition. After fifty transitions,this error will accumulate to 10 L*. Perhaps more realistically, supposethat the average error on each transition, expressed in terms of thedifference between the theoretical and the actual reflectance of thedisplay is ±0.2 L*. After 100 successive transitions, the pixels willdisplay an average deviation from their expected state of 2 L*; suchdeviations are apparent to the average observer on certain types ofimages.

This accumulation of errors phenomenon applies not only to errors due totemperature, but also to errors of all the types listed above. Asdescribed in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,600, compensatingfor such errors is possible, but only to a limited degree of precision.For example, temperature errors can be compensated by using atemperature sensor and a lookup table, but the temperature sensor has alimited resolution and may read a temperature slightly different fromthat of the electro-optic medium. Similarly, prior state dependence canbe compensated by storing the prior states and using a multi-dimensionaltransition matrix, but controller memory limits the number of statesthat can be recorded and the size of the transition matrix that can bestored, placing a limit on the precision of this type of compensation.

Thus, general grayscale image flow requires very precise control ofapplied impulse to give good results, and empirically it has been foundthat, in the present state of the technology of electro-optic displays,general grayscale image flow is infeasible in a commercial display.

Under some circumstances, it may be desirable for a single display tomake use of multiple drive schemes. For example, a display capable ofmore than two gray levels may make use of a gray scale drive scheme(“GSDS”) which can effect transitions between all possible gray levels,and a monochrome drive scheme (“MDS”) which effects transitions onlybetween two gray levels, the MDS providing quicker rewriting of thedisplay that the GSDS. The MDS is used when all the pixels which arebeing changed during a rewriting of the display are effectingtransitions only between the two gray levels used by the MDS. Forexample, the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 7,119,772 describes a displayin the form of an electronic book or similar device capable ofdisplaying gray scale images and also capable of displaying a monochromedialogue box which permits a user to enter text relating to thedisplayed images. When the user is entering text, a rapid MDS is usedfor quick updating of the dialogue box, thus providing the user withrapid confirmation of the text being entered. On the other hand, whenthe entire gray scale image shown on the display is being changed, aslower GSDS is used.

Alternatively, a display may make use of a GSDS simultaneously with a“direct update” drive scheme (“DUDS”). The DUDS may have two or morethan two gray levels, typically fewer than the GSDS, but the mostimportant characteristic of a DUDS is that transitions are handled by asimple unidirectional drive from the initial gray level to the finalgray level, as opposed to the “indirect” transitions often used in aGSDS, where in at least some transitions the pixel is driven from aninitial gray level to one extreme optical state, then in the reversedirection to a final gray level; in some cases, the transition may beeffected by driving from the initial gray level to one extreme opticalstate, thence to the opposed extreme optical state, and only then to thefinal extreme optical state—see, for example, the drive schemeillustrated in FIGS. 11A and 11B of the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No.7,012,600. Thus, present electrophoretic displays may have an updatetime in grayscale mode of about two to three times the length of asaturation pulse (where “the length of a saturation pulse” is defined asthe time period, at a specific voltage, that suffices to drive a pixelof a display from one extreme optical state to the other), orapproximately 700-900 milliseconds, whereas a DUDS has a maximum updatetime equal to the length of the saturation pulse, or about 200-300milliseconds.

Variation in drive schemes is, however, not confined to differences inthe number of gray levels used. For example, drive schemes may bedivided into global drive schemes, where a drive voltage is applied toevery pixel in the region to which the global update drive scheme (moreaccurately referred to as a “global complete” or “GC” drive scheme) isbeing applied (which may be the whole display or some defined portionthereof) and partial update drive schemes, where a drive voltage isapplied only to pixels that are undergoing a non-zero transition (i.e.,a transition in which the initial and final gray levels differ from eachother), but no drive voltage is applied during zero transitions (inwhich the initial and final gray levels are the same). An intermediateform a drive scheme (designated a “global limited” or “GL” drive scheme)is similar to a GC drive scheme except that no drive voltage is appliedto a pixel which is undergoing a zero, white-to-white transition. In,for example, a display used as an electronic book reader, displayingblack text on a white background, there are numerous white pixels,especially in the margins and between lines of text which remainunchanged from one page of text to the next; hence, not rewriting thesewhite pixels substantially reduces the apparent “flashiness” of thedisplay rewriting. However, certain problems remain in this type of GLdrive scheme. Firstly, as discussed in detail in some of theaforementioned Methods for driving displays applications, bistableelectro-optic media are typically not completely bistable, and pixelsplaced in one extreme optical state gradually drift, over a period ofminutes to hours, towards an intermediate gray level. In particular,pixels driven white slowly drift towards a light gray color. Hence, ifin a GL drive scheme a white pixel is allowed to remain undriven througha number of page turns, during which other white pixels (for example,those forming parts of the text characters) are driven, the freshlyupdated white pixels will be slightly lighter than the undriven whitepixels, and eventually the difference will become apparent even to anuntrained user.

Secondly, when an undriven pixel lies adjacent a pixel which is beingupdated, a phenomenon known as “blooming” occurs, in which the drivingof the driven pixel causes a change in optical state over an areaslightly larger than that of the driven pixel, and this area intrudesinto the area of adjacent pixels. Such blooming manifests itself as edgeeffects along the edges where the undriven pixels lie adjacent drivenpixels. Similar edge effects occur when using regional updates (whereonly a particular region of the display is updated, for example to showan image), except that with regional updates the edge effects occur atthe boundary of the region being updated. Over time, such edge effectsbecome visually distracting and must be cleared. Hitherto, such edgeeffects (and the effects of color drift in undriven white pixels) havetypically been removed by using a single GC update at intervals.Unfortunately, use of such an occasional GC update reintroduces theproblem of a “flashy” update, and indeed the flashiness of the updatemay be heightened by the fact that the flashy update only occurs at longintervals.

U.S. application Ser. No. 13/755,111 (Publication No. 2013/0194250)describes various techniques for reducing flashiness in displays,including global limited drive schemes in which only a minor proportionof background pixels are updated during any single transition, so thatcomplete updating of background pixels occurs only after a plurality oftransitions.

The present invention relates to reducing or eliminating the problemsdiscussed above while still avoiding so far as possible flashy updates.

As already indicated, one aspect of this subject matter disclosed hereinrelates to methods to perform smooth updates (e.g., a global complete(GC) update) that may be more visually appealing to some users. SmoothGC updates create transition effects that can be tailored as desiredwithin the constraints of the system. In one embodiment, as illustratedin FIG. 1, a new image 100 may replace a previous image 102 with aspecial transition effect (e.g., scrolling bar 104). In practice, thepixels of the display may be divided into a plurality of non-overlappinggroups. The updates for the various groups may be offsetted from oneanother in time, resulting in a smooth transition with a desiredtransition effect. For example, a scrolling bar moving vertically orhorizontally (FIG. 1 illustrates a vertically moving scroll bar 102), ora “circular update” (in which the various groups of pixels are arrangedas annuli so that the transition moves outwardly or inwardly to or froma central area of the display, as illustrated in FIG. 2), or a barrotating like a clock that uncovers the next image (in which the variousgroups of pixels are arranged in sectors radiating from a centralpoint). Many other transition effects can be created, but all share thefeature that the transition appears smoother and less flashy, as a fullrefresh of the display is spread out in time and spread across the areaof the display such that at a given time, only a small region of thedisplay is being actively updated.

In some embodiments, the location of the groups of pixels should bearranged so that at least one transitory image (e.g. checkerboard, acompany logo, a clock, a page number) or an animation-like effect (e.g.dissolve, wipe, scrolling bar, expanding ring from center or spiral) maybe displayed during the image update. For example, in FIG. 1, the areaof the display may be divided into rectangular regions of a fixed heightand width equal to the width of the display. In a variant of thescrolling bar, for example with larger display signs, where the use of asingle scroll bar might result in a large bar and/or an unacceptableoverall transition time, a display may be divided into rectangularregions each of which is provided with its own scroll bar which onlytraverses its own rectangular region. For instance, the entire displaymay be divided into a matrix of rectangular regions, with regionsalternating along both axes between vertical and horizontal scroll bars.In some other embodiments, as shown in FIG. 2, a display may be dividedinto rings where the radius of the larger circle for a given region isequal to the radius of the smaller circle for its neighboring regiongoing outwards from the center. Then, the updates for the various groupsare offset in time resulting in a smooth transition with a desiredeffect. Having a larger number of groups can be beneficial in making theupdate smoother and also reduce the visibility of the different regionsduring the update, but this may be limited by the constraints of thesystem, such as memory or lookup table size. The time offset can becontrolled to achieve the desired transition effect as it will impactthe speed of the transition. Making the time offset small will make theupdate faster but the update may also become more flashy if the timeoffset is too small. Making the time offset high will make thetransition long and smooth, but the various regions could become visiblemaking the update too blocky if the number of regions is small. Inpractice, it may be desirable to co-optimize the number of regions andtime offset to achieve the smoothest transition with the desired effectwithin the constraints of the system. In some embodiments, a region ofpixels may consist of one row or column of pixels, wherein otherembodiments, a region of pixels may consist of multiple rows or columnsof pixels. In one embodiment, the updating of a display may start withone region or group of pixels having multiple rows of pixels andcontinues one row at a time until all rows of pixels have been updated.In one example, for a display having of having 1600 rows by 1200 columnsof display pixels, and with an update time (e.g, time for a drivingwaveform to fully update a row of pixels) of 250 ms, it would take 400seconds to update the entire display if the update was done one row at atime. Alternatively, using the scrolling bar as an example, one maydesign the waveforms and updating structure in a particular fashion suchthat the multiple rows of pixels may be updated together at a giventime, with a time delay built into pixel rows below such that it appearsa bar is scrolling across the display and the display is being updatedcontinuously. In this configuration, the rows of pixels are updated in acontiguous fashion, where rows of display pixels are updated continuousand in an orderly fashion.

In some embodiments, the pixels in each group may or may not becontiguous depending on the specific application; for example, thepixels of a display may be randomly assigned to differing groups. Thishas been found to be especially advantageous when applied to largedisplays intended as signs in retail stores, malls or outdoor displays,for example menu boards in a restaurant. Such signs may only be updatedat long intervals (for example, a menu board might only be updated a fewtimes per day to display differing menus for breakfast, lunch anddinner) and in such circumstances, long update times of the order of5-60 seconds can be tolerated. Such long update times permit the use ofa large number of groups of pixels. For example, a 32 inch (812 mm)active matrix sign having a scan rate of 50 Hz and intended for use as amenu board was updated with pixels randomly assigned to one of 64groups, with the waveforms for the various groups delayed from oneanother by 0.12 seconds (six scans) resulting in a total delay of 7.56seconds between the first and last groups, and a total update time,including edge clearing sections (as discussed below) not exceeding 10seconds, which is easily tolerable for this type of sign. Since thistype of sign is typically placed behind the service counter and abovehead height so as to be easily readable by a customer approaching thecounter, it is typically read at a distance of at least 8 feet (about2.4 meters) and at this distance the individual pixels are invisible tothe reader, who sees only one image fade and be replaced by a new imagewith essentially no flashiness in the transition,

In some other embodiments, any given pixel may not have to remainpermanently in the same group. Indeed, to the extent that repeatedtransitions using the same boundaries between adjacent groups may tendto produce unwanted optical artifacts such as edge effects along suchboundaries (because it may not be possible to arrange the necessarycorrelation of edge clearing sections across such boundaries, asdiscussed below), it may be advantageous to change the groups after someperiod and/or a given number of transitions. For example, in thearrangement shown in FIG. 2, one might, after a specified number oftransitions move the boundaries between adjacent annuli outwards by oneor more pixels, with a new annulus gradually appearing around the centerof the display. Alternatively, one could gradually move the center,thereby shifting all the boundaries. It should be noted however, thatthose skilled in the technology of active matrix electro-optic displayswill appreciate that in such displays application of a drive pulse doesnot occur simultaneously for pixels in all rows because the display isscanned row-by-row so that, for example, there is a delay of almost oneframe period between the application of a drive pulse to the first rowof a display and application of the same drive pulse to the last row.For ease of explanation, such “intra row delays” are ignored herein, anddrive pulses beginning in the same frame period are regarded as appliedsimultaneously even though in practice they will be applied to differentrows at slightly different times.

In some embodiments, the waveforms or waveform structure for each groupof pixels is not necessarily the same, provided that the color changesof pixels in all the different groups are not effected at the same time.FIGS. 3A-3C illustrates examples of waveforms for different groups forthe same optical transitions. In FIG. 3A, the waveform structure is thesame with one frame time offset between groups, such that at least twogroups of pixels are being updated at a time (i.e., updating waveformsapplied onto the pixel). On the other hand, the waveform structures maybe different, as illustrated in FIGS. 3B and 3C. For example, waveformsin 3B are dissimilar from each other at least in part due to thedifference in the timing of the edge clearing section in reference tothe driving section. Where edge clearing section 304 in group 1 waveformis five frames away from the driving section 302, and in comparison theedge clearing 306 and driving 308 sections of group 4 are only 2 framesapart. FIG. 3C further illustrates a waveform structure where the edgeclearing sections can have different durations and occurs at a differenttimes in reference to the driving sections. In all these cases presentedhowever, the time at which the electro-optic medium starts to transitionfrom black to white or white to black (marked by red and green arrows inFIGS. 3A-3C) is separated from the corresponding time for all othergroups to ensure a smooth transition.

FIGS. 3B-3C also illustrate an important issue regarding waveforms whichare designed to deal with edge effects between adjacent pixels. Suchwaveforms have two sections, namely a driving section (e.g., thesequence of two positive and two negative pulses shown on the left-handsides of each of FIGS. 3A-3C) and an edge clearing section (e.g., thesequence of one or more negative pulses shown on the right-hand sides ofeach of FIGS. 3B-3C). To mitigate the edge ghosting issue, it isdesirable that the edge clearing section of each waveform have at leastone frame in common with the corresponding section of the waveform of atleast one other group. For example, the ghosting along Edge 12illustrated in FIG. 3D can be improved by the overlapping of waveformsfor Groups 1 and 2 in at least one frame (e.g., frame 17), as shown inFIG. 3C. In another example shown in FIG. 3C, the clearing of the Edge14 310 in FIG. 3D is achieved by the overlap between the last frames ofthe driving section of the Group 4 waveform with the first frame of theedge clearing section of Group 1 in frame 15. In the case of randomassignment of pixels to groups, where a pixel of any group may share anedge with a pixel of any other group, it is desirable that all the edgeclearing sections have at least one frame in common, as for exampleillustrated in FIG. 3B, where although the drive sections of all fourgroups commence at different points in time, all four waveforms share acommon single frame edge clearing section. Such a simultaneousapplication of edge clearing by all groups does, however, tend toproduce increased flashiness in the transition, so a compromise may haveto be made between thorough edge clearing and flashiness.

As illustrated in FIGS. 3B and 3C, using this updating configuration,only one region or group of pixels receives or completes a drivingsection of a waveform at any given time, thereby creating a transitionalappearance of display updating, where the update process appears smoothto a user. In addition, the edge clearing section of the multipleregions of pixels share at least one frame in time, to clear theunwanted edge effects between the groups of pixels, as described above.

As already described herein, the methods of the present subject mattermay be implemented in a number of different ways. In one embodiment,using standard existing architecture, waveforms may be stored in alookup table of transitions (see the aforementioned Methods for drivingdisplays applications) encoded in such a way that the controller willcall, for a given pixel, transition k→n where ‘k’ is the unique statethat corresponds to the current optical state of the pixel, and ‘n’ isthe unique state that corresponds to the next optical state of the pixelas requested by the next input image. Typical images are 8-bit andtypical controllers support a lookup table size that is 4-bit or 5-bit,so the desired state from the input image 0-255 is converted by thecontroller to a desired waveform state 0-15 (for a 4-bit controller) or0-31 (for a 5-bit controller). Another way to describe this is thatinput images are 8-bit but typical controllers only support 16 graylevels (for a 4-bit controller) or 32 gray levels (for a 5-bitcontroller).

In some embodiments, the subject matter presented herein may also beimplemented using existing controllers by allocating N waveformtransitions for every single possible transition where N is equal to thenumber of groups of pixels used in the present method. Consider forexample implementing the vertically scrolling bar update method of FIG.1 with a 4-bit controller: if 16 groups of pixels are used, the updatecan only support four gray levels because each actual transitionrequires storage of 16 different waveforms and 4×4×16=256. The firststep is to determine a waveform encoding that allocates to each actualtransitions 16 possible transitions with desired time offsets amongthem. FIG. 4 shows an example of waveform encoding showing thetransition White→Black with a minimum time offset of 8 frames. In thiscase, transitions (13, 14, 15, 16)→(1, 2, 3, 4) have been allocated forthe 16 possible waveforms of White→Black. Transition 13→1 corresponds toWhite→Black that will appear to be updated first in time (i.e., thewaveform for Group 1), while 16→4 is the corresponding waveform thatwill be updated last (i.e., the waveform for Group 16). In the case of abar scrolling from top to bottom, pixels experiencing White→Black in theregion at the top of the display will receive waveform 13→1 while pixelsexperiencing White→Black in the region at the bottom of the display willreceive waveform 16→4.

FIG. 5 explains in more detail the various steps required to achieve aWhite→Black transition with a vertically scrolling bar effect from topto bottom using the waveforms shown in FIG. 4. The first step is tomodify the current state of each pixel recorded in the controller tomatch the initial state required by the waveform. In this case, a maskis applied to the image where state 16 is modified to states 13-16depending on the region in the display. This can be achieved for exampleby requesting a fake update to the controller using an empty waveformand an image that has been appropriately processed. The purpose of thisfake update is to change the current state of the pixels as stored inthe controller. The next step is to request a real update with thewaveforms shown in FIG. 4, using the next image that has beenappropriately processed as shown in FIG. 4 for this particular example.This particular implementation requires requesting a fake update

Edge ghosting along the boundaries between the different regions couldbe a concern in this method, but previous experience suggests that it isnot a serious problem in these types of updates, and the time offsetbetween waveforms used in different regions can be carefully designed tominimize edge ghosting.

Controllers may be designed to allow manipulation of the current stateof the pixels without requesting an update, thus allowing elimination ofthe extra fake update as described with reference to FIG. 5 by replacingthe fake update with processing of the current state of the pixels asstored by the controller, thus potentially accelerating theimplementation of this step. For every pixel, current controllers storecurrent state, next state, and frame count. A controller may store frameoffset as an additional field, thus allowing frame and thus time offsetsbetween waveforms for various regions inside the controller. Forexample, for a vertically scrolling bar update such as that shown inFigure, the frame offset field in the controller would be programmed toachieve the desired scrolling bar transition effect by setting the frameoffset to 0 for pixels located in the top region of the display, and theframe offset would increase for pixels at increasing distances from thetop edge of the display. The frame count and frame offset would be usedby the controller to perform the update. For example, if frame countminus frame offset is negative, no update is performed for that pixel.Otherwise, an update is performed for frame number=frame count−frameoffset.

Modifying existing controllers in this manner should be relativelyinexpensive as the modification only requires storing one extra field,typically a 4-bit field. Such a modified controller would remove theneed for special encoding of the waveforms as described above withreference to FIG. 4 but would permit smooth updates. Also, such acontroller modification would remove the compromise required among thewaveform lookup table size, number of gray levels rendered and thenumber of regions (groups of pixels) used. Finally, such a modifiedcontroller would potentially enable very smooth updates as the number ofregions in the display could be made very large, which would enablegreater flexibility in creating interesting smooth transition effects

From the foregoing, it will be seen that the present invention canprovide smooth full refresh transitions with transition effects that maybe more appealing to certain customers compared to a standard fullscreen global update. The present invention may be especially useful forwearable and mobile device applications.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changesand modifications can be made in the specific embodiments of theinvention described above without departing from the scope of theinvention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to beinterpreted in an illustrative and not in a limitative sense.

1. A method for driving an electric-optic display having a plurality ofdisplay pixels positioned in a plurality of rows and columns, the methodcomprising: dividing the plurality of display pixels into multiplegroups; and updating the multiple groups of pixels in a contiguousfashion by applying at least one waveform to each groups of pixels;wherein at least two groups of pixels are being updated at the sametime.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the multiple groups of pixelseach have at least one row of display pixels.
 3. The method of claim 1,wherein updating the multiple groups of pixels comprising spacing theupdating time of the multiple groups of pixels at least one frames apartfrom each other.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the electric-opticdisplay is an electrophoretic display having a layer of electrophoreticmaterial.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the electrophoretic materialcomprising a plurality of electrically charged particles disposed in afluid and capable of moving through the fluid under the influence of anelectric field.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the electricallycharged particles and the fluids are confined within a plurality ofcapsules or microcells.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein theelectrophoretic material comprises a single type of electrophoreticparticles in a dyed fluid confined with microcells.
 8. The method ofclaim 7, wherein the electrically charged particles and the fluid arepresent as a plurality of discrete droplets surrounded by a continuousphase comprising a polymeric material.
 9. The method of claim 8, whereinthe fluid is gaseous.
 10. A method for driving an electric-optic displayhaving a plurality of display pixels, the method comprising: dividingthe plurality of display pixels into multiple groups of pixels; applyingat least one waveform structure to the multiple groups of pixels, the atleast one waveform structure having a driving section for updating themultiple groups of pixels; and updating the multiple groups of pixels ina contiguous fashion such that only one group of display pixelscompletes the driving section at any given time.
 11. The method of claim10, wherein the at least one waveform structure further comprising anedge clearing section for removing optical artifacts
 12. The method ofclaim 11, wherein the updating step further comprising having the edgeclearing sections for the multiple groups of pixels sharing at least oneframe in time.